段媛元,李雨函,彭旭阳,姜俊志,阎瑞香.双层定向/随机冷冻对纤维素基气凝胶孔结构及吸水性能的调控[J].中国造纸,2026,45(1):1-11 本文二维码信息
二维码(扫一下试试看!)
双层定向/随机冷冻对纤维素基气凝胶孔结构及吸水性能的调控
Regulation of Pore Structure and Water Absorption in Cellulose-based Aerogels via a Combined Directional and Random Freezing Strategy
收稿日期:2025-07-30  修订日期:2025-08-20
DOI:10.11980/j.issn.0254-508X.2026.01.001
关键词:  气凝胶  随机冷冻  定向冷冻  孔结构  吸水性能
Key Words:aerogels  random freezing  directional freezing  pore structure  water absorption properties
基金项目:国家重点研发计划(2022YFD1600704);学生创新培训计划(202510057037)。
作者单位邮编
段媛元* 天津科技大学轻工科学与工程学院天津300457 300457
李雨函 天津科技大学轻工科学与工程学院天津300457 300457
彭旭阳 天津科技大学轻工科学与工程学院天津300457 300457
姜俊志 天津科技大学轻工科学与工程学院天津300457 300457
阎瑞香* 天津科技大学轻工科学与工程学院天津300457 300457
摘要点击次数: 526
全文下载次数: 215
摘要:本研究以羧基化纳米纤维素、聚乙烯醇、分离乳清蛋白为基材,通过调控冷冻温度和方向,开发了一种结合-20 ℃随机冷冻与-196 ℃定向冷冻的双层定向/随机冷冻气凝胶(DF/RF-20),并与-20 ℃慢速随机冷冻(RF-20)、-196 ℃快速随机冷冻(RF-196)、-196 ℃定向冷冻(DF)方式对比,探究了冷冻方式对气凝胶微观结构、密度、孔隙率、力学性能和吸水性能的影响。结果表明,RF-20的孔径大且孔隙分布分散,吸水率为42.21 g/g,但压缩强度较差(44.37 kPa);DF自下而上形成了有序致密的通孔,压缩性能较好(73.39 kPa),但吸水能力较弱(35.80 g/g);相比之下,DF/RF-20兼具高压缩性能(73.90 kPa)、优异的湿态压缩强度(含水率500%时达25.75 kPa)与高吸水率(43.30 g/g),表面吸水速率较RF-20提升了约15倍;在25 ℃下干燥12 h,其表现出良好的保水性能(保水率86.76%),且在不同pH和离子环境中也可保持稳定的吸液能力。
Abstract:This study utilized carboxylated nanocellulose, polyvinyl alcohol, and whey protein isolate as matrix materials. By regulating freezing temperature and orientation, a bilayer directional/random frozen aerogel (DF/RF-20) was developed, combining -20 ℃ random freezing and -196 ℃ directional freezing. It was compared with aerogels prepared under -20 ℃ slow random freezing (RF-20), -196 ℃ fast random freezing (RF-196), and -196 ℃ directional freezing (DF), to investigate the effects of freezing methods on the microstructure, density, porosity, mechanical properties, and water absorption performance of the aerogels. The results showed that RF-20 exhibited large pore sizes with a dispersed pore distribution and a water absorption capacity of 42.21 g/g, but poor compressive strength (44.37 kPa). DF showed ordered and dense through-pores formed from bottom to top, with better compressive performance (73.39 kPa) but weaker water absorption ability (35.80 g/g). In comparison, DF/RF-20 combined high compressive strength (73.90 kPa), excellent wet-state compressive strength (25.75 kPa at 500% water content), and good water absorption capacity (43.30 g/g). Its surface water absorption rate was approximately 15 times higher than that of RF-20. After drying at 25 ℃ for 12 h, it demonstrated good water retention performance (water retention rate of 86.76%) and maintained stable liquid absorption capability under different pH and ionic environments.
查看全文  HTML  查看/发表评论  下载PDF阅读器